Is this really worth an individual article? We don't have articles for the Lords of Winterfell or Casterly Rock either... -- SaganamiFan 12:43, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Obviously I think so because I started it. I think that given that we have articles for titles already it is worth having articles for major lordships that might change hands as the series progresses. This was probably not the best one to start with as it is static under Stannis but I have since started Lord of Winterfell.--Opark 77 14:09, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
Hmm. We do have articles for the King in the North and the King on the Iron Throne, so entries for titles is a good idea. However, I think a single combined 'titles' page with redirects from the individual pages might be a more efficient way of doing it, since it also allows readers to see who is holding what title at the same time.--Werthead 18:55, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
EVERY noble lord in this saga ist called "Lord of {blablah} and head of house {blablah}... you really wanna create an individual article for each of those? -- SaganamiFan 18:04, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
Yes. This should be a comprehensive guide to the show. I don't mind doing it as each lordly character appears. There will inevitably be less of them in the television series than in the books.--Opark 77 13:22, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
I've now created articles for the titles of all of the lords featured or mentioned in the first season. Please let me know if I've missed any.--Opark 77 13:37, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.