All posts by Dave chaves
How is forcing Sansa to marry Tyrion helping Ned Stark? He literally used her to gain the North
I believe it's on youtube
Open field I give an edge to the Dothraki. They will use their horses as their advantage. Even the unsullied couldn't withstand an attack in Open field again the hordes
Which would be who?
I've seen scenes that have been cut out of the show. But not "lost". There was a great scene that absolutely should have been in the show. It was between Tywin Lannister and Maester Pycel.
Where does the battle take place? It could be key
No. The night king didn't determine the seasons. He only brought the long night.
That's my guess too.
No, he didn't give the green light. He gave them what he was thinking for the ending, aka that Brandon Stark would sit the throne, that Daenerys would go mad eventually and other little things. He did not develop the story beyond those little tid bits. If you listen to George interviews after the S8 finally, he tries really hard not to call it trash. He sounds like a politician trying to avoid the question.
For those voting show, please tell me what you like better about the show more than the books.
I want to be a blacksmith that knows how to properly work Valerian steel. They are few, and well paid
@Jake Mansfield house Stark doe not employ knights
You are way off topic btw. Try to stay focused. We are discussing the failure of the writers to adhere to the lore and foundation of the story. For example. The prince/princess that was promised. According to lore should have been of Valerian blood and come when Aegon sat the throne. This could be interpreted as Jon actually being Aegon Targaryen and his throne was the wall. Or it could be that John was not the correct Aegon and the dead march to the long night. Thus leaving a path for Daenerys Targaryen to bare a child named Aegon, and he eventually finds a way to drive the WW back beyond the Wall, or kill them entirely. That would all hold true to the lore.
Not frequent. And it's my favorite word. Doesn't mean anything.
I'm not picking a fight. I'm having a friendly conversation. Not my fault if you aren't capable of doing that
I'm not baiting you. You were already here. In order to baiting something, that something can't be present.
Either way. The lore is necessary to the story and to abandon it is wrong.
I fail to see how debating a topic on a chat forum constitutes any trouble. Oh wait. It's in universe bias
How do you figure? Is that an in universe lore example?
I heard you. But I don't take orders from you. I'll continue to make my points.