Talk:Sexposition

Deletion nomination
I think there are numerous problems with this: --Opark 77 09:53, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * It is written initially from the perspective that the parody is actually real, this is presumably intended to duplicate the "humor" from the original sketch. I didn't find it humorous. I'm not sure it would be a good idea to keep it as is even if it was funny on its own terms.
 * It is potentially confusing to readers who do not get past the lead.
 * It is stretching the limits of our remit; we have not even begun to collate information about critical response to the show let alone writing articles about single characters from parodies.
 * We don't have an article about "sexposition," or even critical response to the show so it is probably too soon for us to be misconstruing interview comments form episodic directors to support tongue in cheek conspiracy theories.