Board Thread:TV Show Discussion/@comment-1399600-20160629121258/@comment-151.224.183.20-20160702153708

Kai200995 wrote:

172.56.29.132 wrote: Well now there is an edit war over whether House Arryn should be listed as a vassal of House Stark. It should depend on whether or not we list Jon as Lord, as the Vale is sworn to him. It's literally one person trolling the page. I say trolling because I left two messages on his talk page that there's an ongoing poll about this topic, and they're still editing to their liking. The purpose of the poll was to reach an agreement and prevent an edit war, not keep it going. So as of now I'm waiting until the poll reaches 100+ voters and I'm petitioning the edit/vote to the admins. By the way the user is Jman321, if you look at the history of the editing I kept adjusting the page to the majority vote and leaving the message to refer to this discussion's poll and that didn't help. I'm not editing the page again until the poll has a significant amount of voters, at least a hundred sound pretty good. So keep following the discussion. I voted on the poll above. I'll give some input as to why  Sansa Stark (official), Bran Stark (rightful) should be Lord/Lady and Heir to House Stark.

While King Snow/Targ can be a King in the North this does not give him legitimate right to Winterfell and to be a Lord of House Stark. Lyanna like Sansa basically said the same thing to him "You are a Stark to me". However 2 Ladies cannot officially denounce a Targaryen or unlegitimized Bastard as the one True Lord of Winterfell/House Stark without legal rights.

I'm not exactly sure how that would reflect in to other Great House(s) perspective, but I don't think they'd like the idea of Targaryen being in charge of House Stark.