Board Thread:TV Show Discussion/@comment-5014364-20161218050632/@comment-5014364-20161218181622

Godzillavkk wrote: You can't expect everyone to be strong, life doesn't work that way. Besides, being strong doesn't neccisarily make a good character, nor does it mean you ALWAYS have to do something. I'd feel safer with a friendy coward then with a brave monster. Remember, Sansa has just begun to play her part in the Game of Thrones, and you can't expect a perfect start all the time. But if it'll make you feel better, I predict Sansa will play an important role next season by being the one who defeats Littlefinger while on campaign in the Riverlands to libetate House Tully.

No. Listen to yourself. This is a complaint about writing.

Sansa is "strong" in the novels. She has an entire subplot rising to prominence in the Vale. Then they cut it out, replaced it with a rape subplot, and a poorly written one at that.

Wow.

Listen to yourself.

The complaint is that....and respond to this specifically...the writers randomly declared that Sansa was "a strong player" for executing Ramsay.

Like, at the SDCC panel this year. They kept saying "Sansa sure was a strong player this year".

The criticism is that they ...intended to write Sansa as "strong", but failed miserably at it.

"Feel better next season"? This was THE SEASON. They promised that Season 6 would have a revenge arc making up for how little she did in Season 5....then didn't really deliver.

Yes, the TV show writers think Sansa is "Strong" now due to poor writing.

...."Sansa Stark" is a fictional character; she doesn't "exist". This is a complaint about writing.

Now you're just rationalizing that "well maybe the writers intended for her to be portrayed as weak because we can't all be strong".

THE WRITERS THEMSELVES think Sansa is "strong" now. For...accepting an offer Littlefinger made?

Do you still believe what you wrote?