Board Thread:TV Show Discussion/@comment-1399600-20160629121258/@comment-1399600-20160717042408

79.231.101.41 wrote: Kai200995 wrote:

189.70.43.19 wrote: No, Jon is not the lord of house stark/winterfell. 'Robb was king of the trident, but Edmure was still the Lord of Riverrrun and Lord Paramount of the Trident. Robb was Edmure's king and ruled from the Riverrun castle for quite a while, but that was never his castle.' The same thing goes for Jon. He'll probably rule from Winterfell because it is the "capitol" of the north and well, it is kinda his home too. But the castle and lady/lordship belongs to sansa, until bran comes along. Thank you! It's so simple to understand this, but people are going fanboy/girl crazy to the point they aren't thinking. I personally think Jon is more of Ned Stark than his other siblings, but its clear that Sansa is Lady/Lord of Winterfell and House Stark, for these reasons above. This does actually not realy matter because Jon will find out that he is the Lord of another House. In the end some Stark will be warden in the North and Jon Targaryen will still be their king. How do you think that will play out? The North isn't strong enough or concerned with the Iron Throne, and that is Jon's current army. No to mention Jon probably will not care. He never wanted anything to do with the politics of the kingdoms after he found out about the white walkers. Claiming the iron throne essentially will not benefit him, saving Winterfell with Sansa was. He was literally forced in ALL of his formal leadership roles.

On the other hand this discussion is about the Lord of House Stark/Winterfell and Jon's role in it. The contributor I quoted above basically just explained the situation, and no one will listen because their fantasy and fanfiction dreams basically came to life when Jon was named King in the North, and they want to fight anything that might compromise it. This is coming from a Jon Snow fan.