Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25402783-20160627073023/@comment-25402783-20160630145804

2.101.115.147 wrote: I don't fully agree about Jon now being categorically a Targaryen. Rhaegar is his father (confirmed) but there's still no evidence that he and Lyanna were ever married, which would mean Jon's still technically a bastard and therefore still not a full member of either house. Bastards can be lowborn or highborn (born to two nobles) but they're still bastards as long as their folks aren't married or they aren't legitimised.

Also, on a biological level, the Stark traits are undoubtedly dominant in Jon (black hair, brown eyes etc). Given he's been raised and spent virtually all his life in the North he's still a Northman by culture. When I say Jon should be added to the member section of the Targaryen page, what I mean is that he is Rhaegars son, so the page should show that. His last name isn't Targaryen, but his father is.