Board Thread:TV Show Discussion/@comment-1399600-20160629121258/@comment-5308269-20160716210731

79.231.101.41 wrote: It's really funny to see some people still "predicting" the future of the series although they were wrong with everything about Jon.

Jon did already warg in the books and it is more than likely that Jon has this ability in the show as well. He probably already did it but couldn't remember after he returned into his body. GRRM also confirmed that Daenerys was not always immune to all kinds of fire. So it will be a sad moment for you when dragon fire will confirm that Jon has dragon't blood because he was born in the blood of his dieing mother (like Tyrion and Tyrion's half-sister Dany)

Please continue with ur funny dreams. This is even more funny like people predicting Jon would ever stay at the Night's Watch or never come back last year.

Let's look at my prediction list:

Jon dieing and brought back - released from his oath - happened

Jon becoming king - 1/7 already happened

Jon being a Targaryen as well as a Stark - confirmed

Jon being the prince who was LITERALLY promised by his mother - confirmed

Jon riding Viserion and becoming immune against fire - more than likely

Looks not that bad until now

The Lordship of Winterfell will never be adressed as an issue during the last 13 episodes because King Jon has of course more important stuff to do and Northern Lords obviously did not care about your "super Bran" rules. "It's funny to see some people "predicting" the future of the series although they were wrong with everything about Jon."

It doesn't take much to predict where this show is going.

"Jon did already warg in the books.."

But in six seasons, he hasn't warged ONCE! Nor has Arya. So why would you expect it now?

"So it will be a sad moment for you..."

I think I can live with it.

"...when dragon't(?) fire will confirm that Jon was born in the blood of his dieing(sic) mother (like Tyrion and his half-sister Dany)."

In Season One, Jon was BURNT by a lantern when he killed a wight. In the same season, Tyrion felt pain from a naked flame when he was having a little game with Shae, who he had just met. So this "sad moment" won't be coming! Sorry!

Everyone knew that Jon was going to be resurrected! Everyone KNEW that Jon was the lovechild of Rhaegar Targaryen and Lyanna Mormont. It's been an open secret for years.

Jon being the King in the North, if anything, looks like a contrivance by the show creators. In the book, most of the Northern lords don't seem to be aware of Robb's will to legitimze Jon Snow and name him his heir. Not only that, but an Ironborn named Wex survived the Bolton sack of Winterfell, and saw the departures of Bran and Rickon. He communicated this information to Wyman Manderly of White Harbor, who dispatches Davos Seaworth to the island Skagos to find Rickon. So in the books at least, they know that Bran and Rickon are alive, so Robb's will would be redundant. The same will they decided not to include in the TV version. So Jon's acclamation as king looks like a desperate act of a people who need a leader. They choose Jon because they BELIEVE that he's Ned's son, and they need a king because they no longer want to serve the Iron Throne. Trouble is that Jon's untested as a ruler. It was Jon's fault that the Battle of the Bastards was almost a defeat, and if these Northern lords were there to see it, they might have thought differently about electing him as their overlord.

"Jon being the prince was LITERALLY promised by his mother - confirmed."

No, she asked Ned to promise her - to keep Jon safe. That which you pass off a "evidence" is clutching at straws. Plenty of people think it's Daenerys ("The dragon must have three heads...but I am too old to be one of them. I should be with her, showing her the way, but my body has betrayed me." - Maester Aemon).

Jon's "important things to do" involves marshalling the Northern forces for the imminent White Walker attack. A job he can do without being their king.

"The Lordship of Winterfell will never be addressed as an issue..."

I think Kit Harington and Sophie Turner suggested the opposite was true in recent interviews.