Board Thread:TV Show Discussion/@comment-5014364-20161218050632/@comment-5014364-20161222185457


 * I pointed out that Sansa Stark didn't really make major political actions in Season 6, and thus if that was the measure of her being "strong", it wasn't.
 * Godzillavkk insisted that Sansa was "strong in other ways" and I was wrong.
 * I countered that my point was about "political agency" and power, not "emotional resilience", and he couldn't really cite a point when she'd made a major political decision.
 * Thus I "challenged him to provide evidence to the contrary", and he couldn't.
 * That isn't me "demanding that he change his opinion"....what, did I threaten to ban him if he merely disagreed? No......that was "losing a discussion based on being unable to cite counter-evidence".
 * So....rather than merely "acknowledge that there was no evidence to support his assertion that Sansa was politically active" or something....he's been in the chat room asking other users how to have me thrown off the wiki? ....that's utterly petulant.  I don't think he understands how "discussion" works on the internet.  I didn't "demand he change his opinion", I pointed out logical fallacies in it; when was a "demand" ever made?

Godzillavkk wrote:

Do you think I should set up a thread to have their admin rights removed, wiki policy allows users to do so if they think an admin is out of line or is unfit to be an admin. I mean if an admins motto is "My way or the highway" then their not fit to be an admin.

.....that is a threat.

Again: I never said "my way or the highway".

ANYONE can read this thread and what was said. I pointed out "Sansa isn't a political player in Season 6 as promised, at most she's emotionally resilient like Gilly but I wouldn't call Gilly a strong political player".

You then...brought up something which happened to you in real life which I'm not sure what you're talking about and...

....accused me of "demanding that you change your opinion"?

See the part further up the thread where I said "If you don't feel that you can give a successful counter response, just stop replying to this thread?....rather than insisting that your position was correct without evidence?

Someone can claim that, I don't know, "Loras was a strong politician in Season 6" when he clearly wasn'te. or that Gilly was. You don't "agree to disagree" on something like that.

If anything, you were the one "demanding" that I acknowledge your opinions without cited evidence.

That...that isn't how "discussion" works.

You were faced with a stronger counter-argument; how is that me "demanding" that you change your opinion, so much as "the facts contradict your opinion"?

And that was your first response, within a day? An Admin disagreed with you on a Discussion Forum discussion, so you...instantly demanded that my Admin status be revoked?

That is ridiculous.